Most of the photos on this site were extracted from reference images (high-resolution tiffs, 20 to 200 megabytes in size) from the Library of Congress research archive. (To query the database click here.) Many were digitized by LOC contractors using a Sinar studio back. They are adjusted by your webmaster for contrast and color in Photoshop before being downsized and turned into the jpegs you see here.

Boston, Massachusetts, circa 1907. "First Church of Christ, Scientist." 8x10 inch dry plate glass negative, Detroit Publishing Company. View full size.
I used to live down the street from the Mother Church. One of my favorite places to hang-out in the summer was in the modern courtyard, by the fountains.
The newer part of the church, on the left, is designed in the Beaux-Arts Classical style - the most popular style of the turn of the century - but not very well. It has some stray elements of the Romanesque (a medieval style), such as the wheel window toward the right (partly hidden by the older church) and the corbel tables on the triangular pediment above it. The older church, on the right, is Richardsonian Romanesque (and rather better at that - after all, Boston was the birthplace of the Richardsonian Romanesque).
The building on the right is known as the Original Mother Church, built in 1894. The one on the left is the Mother Church Extension, built in 1906. More on this, including architectural styles, here:
http://www.sacred-destinations.com/usa/boston-christian-science-mother-c...
Is this Byzantine-Gothic, or what?
Pure Constantinople to the left. A mixture of Romanesque and Highland Romantic to the right. I had to investigate further, and according to Google Images they have since added a large pool bordered by a building which looks to be inspired by Le Corbusier's béton brut style. An interesting example of elements of architectural history in a small space.
The faux stairway commented on below seems to now serve as an essential element in the control of the runoff water which goes between the two buildings, at least judging by the the water pipe which drains onto the slope. Good thing too, large amounts of runoff water in the smell space between the two buildings could cause lots of problems, especially in freeze/thaw cycles.
The inside is all stone and dark wood, built to fit the shape of the lot. Totally asymmetrical where most churches have symmetrical wings of pews, this one has numerous wings of pews each of a different size, shape and angle to the altar. Yet most beautiful.
A block or so behind the church is a sports bar that serves "out of this world" clam chowder, oops off subject.
>> I can understand the lower set of stairs, but what's with what appears to be a set of stairs above that go nowhere, on the smaller Church.
I think if you look closely, you will see that it's the stones behind the top set you point to that make it look like a staircase. The pieces closest to that wall and the dark stones run straight down what is the roof for the lower staircase.


Here's a shot of the smaller church before they built the big mother next door.

Like church structures I get involved with (I'm a fire alarm guy), this building looks as if it evolved over time: it was not designed as it stands as a single structure. I'm guessing that the smaller face we see (rose window on left, bell tower on right)is the original house of worship. Can anyone tell me if I'm right?
I can understand the lower set of stairs, but what's with what appears to be a set of stairs above that go nowhere, on the smaller Church. And, do you enter the larger Church through the smaller one? Interesting overall design for the larger Church, seems to read quite well from outside.
Thanks for clearing up my staircase question. Sort of an optical illusion, the horizontal lines of the roofing material and the stepped flashing at the wall.
Escher-esque!
Today's Top 5