Syndicate content
Syndicate content
Syndicate content
   
Add to Google   Add to My Yahoo!

 
 
Member Photos


Photos submitted by Shorpy members.

 
 
 
About the Photos

Most of the photos on this site were extracted from reference images (high-resolution tiffs, 20 to 200 megabytes in size) from the Library of Congress research archive. (To query the database click here.) Most were digitized by LOC contractors using a Sinar studio back. They are adjusted by your webmaster for contrast and color in Photoshop before being downsized and turned into the jpegs you see here.

 
 
JUMP TO PAGE   100  >  200  >  300  >  400  >  500  >  600
VINTAGRAPH • POSTERS • AMAZING • DISCOVER PUERTO RICO

Atlanta: 1864

Atlanta: 1864

1864. Union Army soldier at Confederate fortifications outside of Atlanta. Wet collodion glass-plate negative by George N. Barnard. View full size.

On Shorpy:
Today's Top 5

Interesting Question

Earliest born person photographed? Although Daguerre is generally considedred the first to have taken a photograph of a person (see his capture of someone getting their shoes shined), I'll suggest that William Henry Fox Talbot took the first photo of someone clearly recognizable. His 1840 photograph of a coachman may stand as the oldest known photo of a person, and the oldest person (?) photographed.
Denny Gill
Chugiak, Alaska

[The commenter was asking: What person in a photograph has the earliest birth year? Possibly someone born in the 1730s or 1740s. - Dave]

 

Book

Perhaps it was the play "Our American Cousin" by Tom Taylor.

 

Book?

Probably a Sidney Sheldon novel he picked up at the gift shot in the Atlanta airport during a six-hour flight delay. Just a guess.
Denny Gill
Chugiak, Alaska

 

Book

Wonder what the book was he was reading.

 

Earliest born person photographed?

Any ideas of what would be the oldest pictured person ever? Hmmm, hard to describe -- what I mean is: what is the earliest-born person ever photographed (e.g., a person born 1795, who was 75 years old, photographed in 1870, etc.)

[Probably an oldster photographed in the late 1830s. - Dave]

 

1864? Wow. That's 143 years!

1864? Wow. That's 143 years! And that photo as good as those from my 3 MP digital camera!

 

Leave a Comment

CAPTCHA
This question is to prevent automated spam submissions. If you were logged in as a registered user, you wouldn't have to bother with this silliness.
 
THE 100-YEAR-OLD PHOTO BLOG
Syndicate content  Shorpy.com | History in HD is a vintage photography blog featuring thousands of high-definition images from the 1850s to 1950s. The site is named after Shorpy Higginbotham, a teenage coal miner who lived 100 years ago. Contact us | Privacy policy | Site contents © 2010 shorpy.com