SHORPY Historic Photo Archive & Fine-Art Prints
 
The Shorpy Archive
 
6000+ fine-art prints suitable for framing. Desk-size to sofa-size and larger, on archival paper or canvas.
 
Join and Share

 
Social Shorpy

To love him is to like him. Our goal: 100k "likes":

 
Syndicate content
Syndicate content
Syndicate content
Daily e-mail updates:

 
 
 

 
Member Photos


Photos submitted by Shorpy members.

 
Colorized Photos


Colorized photos submitted by members.

 
About the Photos

Our holdings include hundreds of glass and film negatives/transparencies that we've scanned ourselves; in addition, many other photos on this site were extracted from reference images (high-resolution tiffs) in the Library of Congress research archive. (To query the database click here.) They are adjusted, restored and reworked by your webmaster in accordance with his aesthetic sensibilities before being downsized and turned into the jpegs you see here. All of these images (including "derivative works") are protected by copyright laws of the United States and other jurisdictions and may not be sold, reproduced or otherwise used for commercial purposes without permission.

WEB SITE & CONTENTS
© 2017 SHORPY INC.

[REV 25-NOV-2014]

 
 
JUMP TO PAGE   100  >  200  >  300  >  400  >  500  >  600
VINTAGRAPH • WPA • WWII • JOIN THE NAVY, 1917

Miss Maxwell: 1922

Miss Maxwell: 1922

San Francisco circa 1922. "Misses Maxwell and Chalmers." Carrying (or wearing) the banner for two car brands not long for this world, and whose assets would form the basis of the Chrysler Corporation. 5x7 glass negative. View full size.

 
On Shorpy:
Today's Top 5

Ah ooo ga!

The Maxwell radiator emblem had red/white stripes with blue on top, me's thinkin' that their name tags are switched

Rolled Stockings In the '20s vs. Leg-Warmers Of The '80s

I used to be utterly perplexed at the fashion of rolled stockings. It went against everything I knew about stockings. My great-grandmother, in her 70s (when I was a teenager), used to wear her stockings that way and I couldn't understand why she did that (she turned 25 in 1920). Besides being all wrong about how stockings were supposed to be worn, they looked very uncomfortable, given that a tightly rolled rubberband was how she kept them up. But in the 1920s, rolled stockings made them feel pretty, daring, sexy, and fashionable.

It was only in the last few years that I (now 60) finally "got it". Just think back to the 1980s and leg-warmers. The way they were worn as a fashion statement looked silly to me, and I didn't think they were even remotely sexy. Just the opposite; I thought it made the legs look fatter than they actually were. Aside from not wanting my legs to look fat, I never wore them because I thought they looked stupid and served no practical purpose, like jeans that are bought already deliberately ripped, faded or made victims of chemical spills. Yet women bought and wore leg-warmers proudly on a daily basis, all bunched down around the calves, which did little to keep the legs warm. But it made them feel pretty, daring, sexy, and fashionable.

Now I finally "get" how the rolled stockings fashion trend of the 1920s was perceived by the women of that time. The rolled stockings were to the 1920s what the legwarmers were to the 1980s.

Hot fashion

Those rolled stockings have a caught-with-your-pants-down look to them. What in the world were they thinking?

The newsies at the far right add a pleasant Rockwellian touch.

I'll take Miss Chalmers ...

She's the bee's knees. Oh, you kid!

 
SHORPY HISTORICAL PHOTO ARCHIVE
Shorpy.com | History in HD is a vintage photo archive featuring thousands of high-definition images from the 1850s to 1960s. (Available as fine-art prints from the Shorpy Archive.) The site is named after Shorpy Higginbotham, a teenage coal miner who lived 100 years ago.

Syndicate content RSS | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Photo Use | © 2017 Shorpy Inc.