SHORPY Historic Photo Archive & Fine-Art Prints
 
The Shorpy Archive
 
6000+ fine-art prints suitable for framing. Desk-size to sofa-size and larger, on archival paper or canvas.
 
Join and Share

 
Social Shorpy

To love him is to like him. Our goal: 100k "likes":

 
Syndicate content
Syndicate content
Syndicate content
Daily e-mail updates:

 
 
 

 
Member Photos


Photos submitted by Shorpy members.

 
Colorized Photos


Colorized photos submitted by members.

 
About the Photos

Our holdings include hundreds of glass and film negatives/transparencies that we've scanned ourselves; in addition, many other photos on this site were extracted from reference images (high-resolution tiffs) in the Library of Congress research archive. (To query the database click here.) They are adjusted, restored and reworked by your webmaster in accordance with his aesthetic sensibilities before being downsized and turned into the jpegs you see here. All of these images (including "derivative works") are protected by copyright laws of the United States and other jurisdictions and may not be sold, reproduced or otherwise used for commercial purposes without permission.

WEB SITE & CONTENTS
© 2017 SHORPY INC.

[REV 25-NOV-2014]

 
 
JUMP TO PAGE   100  >  200  >  300  >  400  >  500  >  600
VINTAGRAPH • WPA • WWII • JOIN THE NAVY, 1917

Who's a Good Boy?

Who's a Good Boy?

Circa 1894. "Reuter, Fritz." The son (and, presumably, dog and cat) of Washington, D.C., hotelier Fritz Reuter. Glass negative by the C.M. Bell studio. View full size.

 
On Shorpy:
Today's Top 5

View Camera oddities

I agree that it looks like the boy's upper half is just out of focus, not motion blur. Motion blur shows distinct lines in the direction of motion, whereas out-of-focus is just soft. It almost looks like the plane of focus is tilted far from vertical, maybe at 45 degrees or so. If the plane of focus was vertical, you couldn't get things both in front of and behind the kid, and his feet, in focus. The foreground, and a fair bit of the background is in focus but it goes out of focus farther from the ground. You can do that with a view camera, but it's hard to do it to this extreme by accident. So it must have been intentional - but why? The depth of field appears tiny, too.

Stuffed animals?

A 1908 glass negative where the exposure is so long the child is blurred from movement.... yet the dog and cat sat still long enough to be in good focus? I think the animals are stuffed props of the studio (along with the wagon, background and clothing).

[The dog's head shows slight motion blur. It and the cat, both live animals, are also seen here. The boy's head exhibits optical, not motion blur. -tterrace]

Every Cat's Fantasy

To be forced to sit in a small wagon with an 80 lb. dog who happens to have jaws like an alligator.

It's Buster!

(Woof!) That's my dog Tige, he lives in a shoe. I'm Buster Brown, look for me in there too.

One of those pictures

The ones your parents drag out and embarrass you with 20 years later.

 
SHORPY HISTORICAL PHOTO ARCHIVE
Shorpy.com | History in HD is a vintage photo archive featuring thousands of high-definition images from the 1850s to 1960s. (Available as fine-art prints from the Shorpy Archive.) The site is named after Shorpy Higginbotham, a teenage coal miner who lived 100 years ago.

Syndicate content RSS | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Photo Use | © 2017 Shorpy Inc.