The Shorpy Archive
 
6000+ fine-art prints suitable for framing. Desk-size to sofa-size and larger, on archival paper or canvas.
 
Join and Share

 
Social Shorpy

To love him is to like him. Our goal: 100k "likes":

 
Syndicate content
Syndicate content
Syndicate content
Daily e-mail updates:

 
 
 
 
Member Photos


Photos submitted by Shorpy members.

 
Colorized Photos


Colorized photos submitted by members.

 
About the Photos

Most of the photos on this site were extracted from reference images (high-resolution tiffs, 20 to 200 megabytes in size) from the Library of Congress research archive. (To query the database click here.) Many were digitized by LOC contractors using a Sinar studio back. They are adjusted by your webmaster for contrast and color in Photoshop before being downsized and turned into the jpegs you see here.

 
 
JUMP TO PAGE   100  >  200  >  300  >  400  >  500  >  600
VINTAGRAPH • WPA • WWII • THE NAVY NEEDS YOU IN THE WAVES

The Summer of '41, 2.0

The Summer of '41, 2.0

A colorized version of Russell Lee's "Summer of '41," posted here in 2007. View full size. I wrote an article for Rangefinder Publishing's AfterCapture magazine detailing my technique. You can download "Colorizing a Memory" here.

"Everyone is turning colors"

So I'm guessing that the commentors who don't care for colorization were revolted by the movie "Pleasantville."

"What do you want to do to me right now? Come on. Everyone is turning colors. Kids are making out in the street. No one is getting their dinner. Hell, you could have a flood any minute! Pretty soon, the women could be going off to work, while the men stayed at home and cooked!" -- David in "Pleasantville"

Colorization goes back many years

I have a photo that used to hang on my grandmother's bedroom wall that was colorized, in 1900. I am not sure if it was the photographer, or someone else, but whoever it was dated their work on the back. I haven't liked many of the colorized things I have seen online, because the colors are too bright, in many of them. There are a few that I like, though, including this one, and I certainly don't see any harm in it! If someone painted the original, and there were no copies, I would be upset, but I don't think there is anyone here who would do that, anyway!

Purple Bikini

Check out the pipes on her!

Was she the local arm-wrestling champ, or something? Maybe the popsicle is part of her training diet.

Re: Kodachrome Emulation

I'm pretty sure that whatever method Alienskin uses to approximate Kodachrome's "look" is based on modern samples.

The Kodachrome emulsion of 60 years ago was very different, with a color balance that favored yellows and reds. You could probably use the Alienskin Exposure2 plugin as a starting point, but you'd need to do additional color correction to dial an image's color to match the old Kodachrome look.

Mouthwatering...

I mean of course the grape flavor popsicle. I have a small supply of grape soda imported from the US in the refrigerator for good humor moments like these and I'm gonna open one right now. Grape popsicles are a big part of my childhood memories of summer. Just like the small of Coppertone. or the taste of a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.

Great work. Thanks for the tutorial. You mentioned Kodachrome and the Alienskin plugin. I want to emulate Kodachrome so that color photos will look like the Kodachrome images here on Shorpy.

Even with the plug-in I've had no luck trying, the effect doesn't even come close. Any ideas?

Color me impressed

John, this is fabulous. I'm relatively new to colorizing, and while it's a lot of fun, I find my results a little disappointing at times. Thanks to your description of how you achieve more natural skin tones, I now know why. To all the colorizing detractors: colorizing an old picture is like being a kid and getting a new coloring book and a big box of Crayolas. It doesn't damage the original, for which the colorizer still has the utmost respect. It's just fun to see an old image brought to life by imagining it as we would see it had we been there to witness it in person. It brings a freshness and an immediacy to the image. We don't see in black and white. Tea said it best: "...adding color makes it look like it was only yesterday."

I couldn't disagree more

I couldn't disagree more strongly on the anti-colorization sentiments. The original B/W image still remains so where is the downside? The upside is an incredible view of the past that is more familiar to us or perhaps more consistent with our present context. I LOVE the colorized version. It transports me back to that time and places me in the picture for sure. It is like watching B/W WWII footage versus color footage. The difference is staggering.

Keep up the awesome work!

Little Pink Houses, or I Don't Believe in Yesterday

Why, exactly, should a photograph originally taken nearly 70 years ago look as though it "was taken yesterday"? What is gained? If an original photo was taken in black and white because color photography wasn't available or affordable to the photographer or just because he or she wanted it in black and white, I don't see how primping it up improves anything. I hope nobody goes after Mathew Brady's work with this process.

Fun With Color

I enjoy seeing what can be done. No harm done, it's another way to have fun, and it brings out details you might miss in the original (per the grape popsicle). Advice to Colorists: never leave anything uncolored even if it is supposed to be grey (such as the concrete wall). Real life surfaces are mottled, and shadows take on subtle colors reflected from nearby patches of light. Aside from this, this picture is very convincing.

Re: Colorization Sucks

No doubt, some folks don't or won't like the idea of adding subjective color to a monochromatic image. However, it is a visual technique capable of revitalizing precious memories.

I've done colorizations for family members of deceased loved ones in which they wish to memorialize and remember the family member as they appeared in life.

Life is not black and white—it is in color. The addition of well-applied color to a b/w photograph is sometimes the only way to heighten the sense of life the subjects once possessed. The result is often emotionally overwhelming for the family members upon first viewing.

It's not necessarily a matter of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it.". Sometimes it's a matter of "if it adds life, enhance it."

A STUPENDOUS job.

A STUPENDOUS job. And how bizarre that just adding color makes it look like it was only yesterday. Except for the swimsuits, which are a bit different, and the fact that people aren't actively TRYING to crisp themselves anymore (Olive oil!? -- I thought the baby oil phase was bad) people seem still much the same, lying around in the yard, goofing off.

Colorization Sucks!

No matter how good the so-called "artist" might be at it, it reminds me of the "fake stereo" records of my childhood, where classic recordings by Bessie Smith and Duke Ellington and Jelly Roll Morton and other 1920's, 30's and 40's musicians would be "enhanced" with echo-chamber effects, phasing, and other such audio fakery before they were sold as LP collections to a public that had never heard the originals.

Never mind that the original musicians and recording engineers had nothing of the sort in mind— this technical effing around was considered an "improvement" by the utter morons who were responsible for all those travesties.

Old saying, origin unknown: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"

Backyard Beach

Love the grape Popsicle! Suntan oil came in a can??

[It's a can of Pompeiian olive oil. Click to enlarge. - Dave]

Nice work!

I especially like the realistic flesh tones. They're among the hardest colors to get right.

 
THE 100-YEAR-OLD PHOTO BLOG
Shorpy.com | History in HD is a vintage photo blog featuring thousands of high-definition images from the 1850s to 1950s. The site is named after Shorpy Higginbotham, a teenage coal miner who lived 100 years ago.

Syndicate content RSS | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Photo Use | © 2014 Shorpy Inc.