Framed or unframed, desk size to sofa size, printed by us in Arizona and Alabama since 2007. Explore now.
Shorpy is funded by you. Patreon contributors get an ad-free experience.
Learn more.
Summer 1940. Washington, D.C. "Modeling blue dress made from sugar sacks, designed for a high school girl on a low income by graduate students of the Department of Clothing and Textiles, School of Home Economics, University of Alabama. Total cost of materials was three dollars and eighteen cents." Photo by John Collier for the Farm Security Administration. View full size.
Those sacks could make a nice photographic backdrop, too.
What a sweet photo. And it's a pretty, well-made dress. So many women and girls then were skilled home sewers.
In the 30s and 40s my great grandfather was an executive in the Chase Bag Company, Milwaukee, Wis.
They produced cloth bags for feed companies printed with patterns. When empty, these bags could be washed and made into shirts, dresses and so on.
I remember as late as the late 50s wearing shirts made by my mother out of these "pretty prints."
Here's an article on the practice.
Although designed for a low-income girl, $3.18 was quite a bit of money in 1940. The minimum wage in 1940 was 30 cents an hour, meaning that one would have to work over 10 hours for the cost of the supplies for one dress. Using the consumer price index, the cost of materials would be about $56 today.
That being said, it takes a lot of talent to look at some sugar sacks and say "I think I can make a dress out of these."
[Most of that $3.18 was the cost of the sugar (over 60 pounds' worth, maybe a year's supply), dress or no dress. And three bucks for a dress in 1940 was cheap, the price of a bra or pair of pajamas. "Economy" dresses in the big department stores were $8. - Dave]
But wow, $3.18 in 1940, adjusted for inflation, is $56 today! And that's just the materials! It's astonishing how cheap clothes have gotten.
Sheila sewed a shapely summer smock from six sugar sacks.
On Shorpy:
Today’s Top 5