SHORPY Historic Photo Archive & Fine-Art Prints
The Shorpy Archive
9000+ fine-art prints suitable for framing. Desk-size to sofa-size and larger, on archival paper or canvas.
Join and Share

Support Shorpy

Shorpy is funded by you. Help by purchasing a print or contributing. Learn more.

Social Shorpy


Join our mailing list (enter email):

Member Photos

Photos submitted by Shorpy members.

Colorized Photos

Colorized photos submitted by members.

About the Photos

Our holdings include hundreds of glass and film negatives/transparencies that we've scanned ourselves; in addition, many other photos on this site were extracted from reference images (high-resolution tiffs) in the Library of Congress research archive. (To query the database click here.) They are adjusted, restored and reworked by your webmaster in accordance with his aesthetic sensibilities before being downsized and turned into the jpegs you see here. All of these images (including "derivative works") are protected by copyright laws of the United States and other jurisdictions and may not be sold, reproduced or otherwise used for commercial purposes without permission.

© 2019 SHORPY INC.

[REV 25-NOV-2014]

JUMP TO PAGE   100  >  200  >  300  >  400  >  500  >  600

Bunny Roosevelt: 1920

Bunny Roosevelt: 1920

Washington, D.C., circa 1920. "Mrs. Theodore Roosevelt Jr." Née Eleanor Butler ("Bunny") Alexander. Harris & Ewing Collection glass negative. View full size.

On Shorpy:
Today's Top 5
To stay online without a paywall or a lot of pop-up ads, Shorpy needs your help. (Our server rental alone is $3,000 a year.) You can contribute by becoming a Patron, or by purchasing a print from the Shorpy Archive. Or both! Read more about our 2019 pledge drive here. Our last word on the subject is: Thanks!

Bunny and Mr, Marshall

I am reading a book about WW2 leaders and Mrs. Roosevelt's name came up. She contacted General George C. Marshall and asked him to put her husband back into a combat unit after he was hospitalized. She apologized for using her position to get this. Marshall replied that it was "always alright to pull strings and favors if what you wanted was a more dangerous job than the one you had."

Sounds like quite a woman. Real looker too.

When I first started retouching...

back in the early seventies, we would lightly use the edge of an X-acto blade to carefully remove the silver layer of black and white photos to remove darker areas. This was pretty harsh, and you could easily damage the photo if not careful. By that I mean you could tear into the paper backing. Soon came the use of iodine bleaches, that would lift the silver more gently, and leave the emulsion intact. Again, care and experience was key, as too much bleach,or too long a wait to neutralize would bleach the image to pure white. It was fun in a way, but I'd rather use Photoshop now.

I'll leave retouching E6 transparencies for another time. You may as well have been doing brain surgery.

Accentuating the negative

>> some of this may have been achieved in the darkroom or perhaps even later with a copy of the photo

Messing with the apparent depth of field on the negative is extremely unlikely, almost impossible, but touching up negatives was common. I worked in a portrait studio in the 1980s, and "spotted" negatives (and prints) with a fine-point brush, hiding blemishes & wrinkles.

[This negative, like most of the H&E portraits, was marked up with a pen or pencil to add highlights. - Dave]

Depth of Field

Another poster mentioned the nice out of focus portions of this photograph but under close examination it appears that some of this may have been achieved in the darkroom or perhaps even later with a copy of the photo. Is that possible?

[This was imaged from the original glass negative. - Dave]


Did they call her that because she liked to wear two or three at a time?

Tactile Memories

I can feel that fur against my face from when I was small in the late 30's and used to snuggle into the fur on my mother's coat. It looked just like the one shown here. Sure proves to me that one did not have to be rich to wear fur because we most certainly were not.

So chic!

The lady is clearly a beauty, and has a wonderful sense of style! No wonder Teddy Jr. fell for her.

She's beautiful

She's a very pretty woman; I'd rather see her without the hat, though.

Absolutely lovely

Such modesty. "Beautiful young people are accidents of nature, but beautiful old people are works of art." -- The other Eleanor Roosevelt

The Great Escape

It appears to me that a smile is about to break out.


...would have a field day with this one. Fur, fur and feathers.


That is all I can say - WOW~!!!!!!

Who needs color?

This is some picture. The richness of detail, the depth, the way it goes in and out of focus. Plus the subject is quite striking. Whatever she paid for this portrait, she got her money's worth.

[Who needs color? Funny you should mention that. - Dave]

SHORPY OLD PHOTO ARCHIVE | History in HD is a vintage photo archive featuring thousands of high-definition images from the 1850s to 1960s. (Available as fine-art prints from the Shorpy Archive.) The site is named after Shorpy Higginbotham, a teenage coal miner who lived 100 years ago.

Syndicate content RSS | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Photo Use | © 2019 Shorpy Inc.